Lucky, thank you for your most informative post. I do see a definitive advantage in, as you say, "letting an event come to you, rather than chasing the event". Please indulge me a couple of questions regarding your example above: 1.) It appears to me that you're example above which represents a 3.70 ecart (singles vs. series), that you're betting for the "3-series", expecting the "runs" to go to 3. Why, then, are you at -9 on your first play, when, in fact, R did hit the 3rd spot. (B RRR B-9 Why?) Shouldn't you have won with the 3rd R? 2.)I do not understand your "march". Could you please explain more precisely how you attack the ecart, in unit terms? The -9, +9, +9, +3 is a bit confusing to me as to how you got to those figures. 3.) You said, "If we use singles contra (vs.) series and get an statistical ecart 3.0, then the march have to start when the outcomes indicates that the underrepresented figure, that the events is going for balance. RRRBBRR This is the core for the final solution, how, why, where do you start your real play after a qualified signal." Lucky, where did you get the RRRBBRR from? It's nowhere in your above posted example. And, of what meaning is RRRBBRR? I do believe that there is a final solution within your play, Lucky. I'm just unclear as to when and how you begin your attack. Lucky, I thank you in advance for your further enlightment.

Hi, i was thinking the best way to show you how its done is to publish the statistics so you can see everything step by step. I have been writing about this before and been very careful how i represent it, i did it my way with my words, but still referring my knowledge from the creator regarding this approach. The issue here is, if i am going to explain the core whit statistics i have to refer to the exact pages and his name so he doesn't take legal action against me. Will it be correct if i write it like this: (K.v.Haller's Roulette lexicon, Page. 444 to 448) and then post the statistics and the 2 marches from those pages.

Thanks anyway, Lucky. I greatly appreciate your efforts to assist us in being the very best we can be at the gaming tables. I'm quite certain that is why we're all here; to read, question, and learn.

Trying Bliss DBL after the first switch that appers, bet the decision before last. RESULT WWL L WWL WL WWL WWWWWL WWL Or if we only bet once WLWWWWW AND WL WWL WWL WWWWWWL WWL Or if we only bet once WWWWW Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2003-01-02 Series contra singel. Red-Black. Statistical Ecart 3,00 R R R B B R B B B B R R B B B R R B B R R B B R B B R R R R B B R R B B..3,00 R..R B..B + R..R + R.....- R B B.....- R..R B..B + R..R + R.....- B..B R..R + R.....- B..B R..R + B..B + B - R..R B..B + R..R + B..B + R..R + B..B + B.....- R R B..B R..R + B..B + B.....- B Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2000-01-01 Series contra singels. Even-Odd. Statistical Ecart 3,0 O O E E O O E E E O O O E E E E O O O E E E E E E E E E O E E O O E E O O O O O E O O E E 3,0 O O E E + E - E E E O O E E + O O + O - E E O O + E E + E - E E E O O E E + O O + E E + O O + E E + O O + O - O O E E O O + E E + E - E E O E E E E E E O O E E O O E E O O O E E O E Trying Bliss DBL after the first serie of 2 RESULT WL L WL WL WWWWL WL Or if we only bet once WLWWWW AND L WL WL WWWWWL WL Or if we only bet once LWWWW Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2003-01-02 Series contra singel. Red-Black. Statistical Ecart 3,00 R R R B B R B B B B R R B B B R R B B R R B B R B B R R R R B B R R B B..3,00 R..R B..B R..R + R.....- R B B.....- R..R B..B R..R + R.....- B..B R..R R.....- B..B R..R B..B + B - R..R B..B R..R + B..B + R..R + B..B + B.....- R R B..B R..R B..B + B.....- B Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2000-01-01 Series contra singels. Even-Odd. Statistical Ecart 3,0 O O E E O O E E E O O O E E E E O O O E E E E E E E E E O E E O O E E O O O O O E O O E E 3,0 O O E E E - E E E O O E E O O + O - E E O O E E + E - E E E O O E E O O + E E + O O + E E + O O + O - O O E E O O E E + E - E E O E E E E E E O O E E O O E E O O O E E O E

Thank you, Lucky, for your further exambles of taking advantage of the ecart. What money-management plan would you recommend to best profit from the ecart "correction"? What is a "masse egale"? Do you use a positive or a negative progression, or do you simply prefer to flat bet? Thanks again for your guidance, Lucky.

What is a "masse egale"? Hi mate, "masse egale" = Equal Volume or Same Mass, which translated to roulette is FLAT BETTING (fixed amount between bets, without using a progression). Hope it helps in understanding. Victor.

Here are some hints where you can find qualified signals. Then you can see how the WL strikes perform after a statistical ecart of 3,00. The beauty is that you almost always win at your first bet and its very rare that you have to use 2 steps. --- Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 January 2003 01 02 Red-Black Series Contra Singels Statistical Ecart 3,00 Resultat: Win --- Speilbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 January 2003 01 06 High-Low Series cnontra Singels Statistical Ecart 3,29 Result: Win --- Spilbank Hamburg Table No 1 January 2003 01 07 Even-Odd Series contra Singels Statistical Ecart 3,00 Result: Win --- Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 Februari 2003 02 01 High-Low Series contra Singels Statistical Ecart 3,29 Resultat: Win --- Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 Februari 2003 02 06 Even-Odd Series contra Singels Statistical Ecart 3,00 Resultat: Win

Hi i thought you might want an example for series contra higher series. Here we go: Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2003-01-01 Qualified Signal: High-Low - Series Contra Higher Series - Statistical Ecart 3,00 .............LOW .............LOW HIGH .............LOW .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW .............LOW .............LOW .............LOW .............LOW .............LOW HIGH .............LOW HIGH .............LOW .............LOW HIGH .............LOW HIGH .............LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH .............LOW .............LOW HIGH .............LOW .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW .............LOW HIGH .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW HIGH .............LOW .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW .............LOW..............ST 3,00 HIGH .............LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH.........................WIN HIGH HIGH .............LOW HIGH HIGH .............LOW .............LOW .............LOW .............LOW 14 series of 2 Contra 2 series above 2 Isn't that beautiful and effective and people are still discuss the issue if there is or isn't a fallacy :)

Lucky, thanks again for your valuable posts regarding the ecarts. I've no doubt in my mind whatsoever that this type of play will yield profitable results. I believe that even if one were to lose on their first few attempts at the "correction", that the ecart play would now be an EVEN STRONGER play. I'm just not sure as to the correct "march", or progression, to use when the "correction" takes a bit longer than expected. Also, Lucky, why stop at one win? Couldn't we take advantage of the "correction" (after an ecart of 3 or more) a bit MORE than that? I'd prefer to pick up at least 3 wins to losses after waiting for such an imbalance. (A total of 3 more wins than losses.) Too aggressive? I don't think so. What do you think?

Robotic i am so happy that there finally is one like you that recognize when a long term winner is posted and that you are willing to improve, argue and develop it further. The march as we agree on has to, at the first state indicate that is goes for correction. This particular march only refers to the series contra singels. That leave us to wait for the first serie of 2 to appear and play it will continue to be a serie of 3. If it lose we have to wait until we get a new serie of 2 and play it will continue for a serie of 3. If it lose we have to wait for a new serie of 2 to appear and play it will continue to be a serie of 3. Here it ends, that's it, 3 loses. The first interval. Now we have to wait for a serie of 3 to appear and play it will continue to be a serie of 4. If it lose we have to wait for a serie of 2 appear and then play it will continue to be a serie of 3. If it lose we have to wait it will continue to be a serie of 2 and play it will continue to be a serie of 3. Here it ends, that's it, 3 loses. The second interval. Lets take a look at the statistical ecart regarding this march: The first level begins at 3,00 - 14:2 - and it rise by 3 step or above, lets say 17:2 = 3,44 we lose 3 times in a row. The second level begins at 3,44 or above, lets say 3,44 - 17:2 Now if we lose 3 times it rise to 3,83 Probably it will rise above 4,00 before the secound interval... Now once at Monte Carlo 1939 it hit above 5,00 41 high 4 low. We will probably never experience that :) So would it be more effective to play FTL all the way after the first serie of 2, it might if we apply intervals.

Well using masse égale FTL would not work. But for progression and a stop limit after 2 loses in a row and play for 2 intervals might work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2003-01-01 Qualifid Signal: High-Low - Series Contra Higer Series - Statistical Ecart 3,00 ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW HIGH ........ LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH ........ LOW ........ LOW HIGH ......... LOW ........ LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW ......... LOW HIGH .......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW HIGH ......... LOW ......... LOW HIGH HIGH ......... LOW ......... LOW SE 3,00 HIGH ......... LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH...........WIN HIGH...........WIN HIGH...........WIN ........ LOW LOSS HIGH HIGH...........WIN ........ LOW LOSS ........ LOW WIN ........ LOW WIN ........ LOW WIN Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2003-01-02 Qualifid Signal: Red-Black - Series Contra Higer Series - Statistical Ecart 3,00 RED RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED RED RED RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK RED RED RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK RED RED ........ BLACK RED RED ......... BLACK RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK RED RED..........................SE 3,00 ........ BLACK RED ......... BLACK ......... BLACK ......... BLACK WIN RED.................LOSS RED.................WIN RED.................WIN ........ BLACK LOSS ........ BLACK WIN RED.................LOSS ........ BLACK RED.................LOSS ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK RED ........ BLACK ........ BLACK WIN ........ BLACK WIN RED....................LOSS RED RED....................WIN RED....................WIN ........ BLACK LOSS ........ BLACK WIN

Lucky, thank you for the kind words. I am an experienced gambler (not at roulette, however) with a lot of "table time" logged under my belt. I have played various methods and still do. What intrigues me the most, however, is this: it was when you had stated; "There is a difference between chasing an event or letting the event COME TO YOU". It seems to me that most people, myself included, head out to the tables seeking to profit on their 'trends', their preferred bet selection. What happens however, when their trend/bet selection is in the state of hibernation? They, we, I, lose. But, if one were to track for the ecart and THEN play for the correction, I believe, then their winning percentage would HAVE TO IMPROVE dramatically. Now, all of this is well and good. But, what if: NO ECART. Ecarts are not abounding everywhere we look. On the contrarty, I'm quite certain that you're not going to find them too often; not ecarts of 3, anyway. So, it still begs the question: What to do while tracking/charting and WAITING for the ecart? There's where we will find out the truth about YOU, as a gambler. Lucky, I'm not certain, as yet, as to how to bet for the correction after I find the ecart. Quite possibly, I'll just use a progression to enhance the profitability. That is still a work in progress for me. I would like to make one more comment/observation. I believe that the ecart is more powerful, more "abnormal", and, thus, more profitable for us when it's singles vs. series as opposed to series vs. higher series. Why do I say that? My vast experience at the tables tells me that singles vs. runs (or, as you put it, series) virtually NEVER FAILS to correct itself at a high rate; meaning that the correction should leave me at least 3 to 5 wins over any losses. (and, possibly more) I believe I can flat bet that correction, and still pick up some nice profit. Anyhow, I can't thank you enough for your assistance and contributions regarding this subject, Lucky. I wish you every success in all of your gaming ventures. Robotic