Now, concerning the "Quiz to be solved". Isn't he just demonstrating how to structure the 12 numbers over the table in suitable combinations, depending on the localization of the numbers? eg. play splits there, lines there , a doublestreet, corners, and so on..Or i'm i totally out of track? Thx /compa

Ray That post was one of his earlier posts. On the 16 April he put that there. Funny how all this time nobody reported winning with it or even -*test*-('")ing it. The numbers on the wheel are different from the table numbers. So 7 8 9 10 11 12 are all over the board. There are 17 numbers between 12 & 11 going clockwise & including Zero. And 20 numbers from 11 to 12. If you are taking from 7 to 12 then you have 6 of those 20 numbers in that section of the wheel. Which would give you a 30% chance of hitting them. Providing the ball kept hitting in those 20 numbers. See now here is where WE differ I guess. If that was happening I would be counting how many spins it did not hit in the other 17 numbers. If it has not hit there for 8 spins then it would be over 99% sure to hit there in any future spins. Besides if this was so good then all we would have to do is wait for 7 8 9 10 11 12 25 26 27 28 29 30 to come & then just take the 2 lines 7 to 12 & 25 to 30 I will have a look at this & see what I come up with. But I think it will be like His number sections when I played them I got a horrendous run of sections like. 1 2 3 3 3 <bet (3) then 2 2 1 1 1 1<bet (1) then 3 2 3 3 2 3< bet (3) then 1 2 2 1 1 1< bet (1) & so on. Until I lost $550 then I won it back with Victor's Lw Method & Promised Myself that I would never play His system again. Lanky

So, one's focusing on the weel instead of the table so to speak? In that case i still do not get it. What's the connection? You still have to bet on the table, lol:=) The System presented where one's suppose to track 14 numbers and pick the last 4 numbers with its unhit neighbours i understand but not this..

Ok I had another look at Chippo’s rules he says to take them at least 3 times. Sorry I did not see that When I did the other -*test*-('") that I deleted to be fair to Chippo. Ok we will do them for 3 Ls in a row & bet them the way He says with 112 progression then we will divide our losses by 4 from there to give us the best chance to either break even or win on a won bet & continue betting that way & see what we get from it betting when any 7 8 9 10 11 12 25 26 27 28 29 30 comes up. 24 30 32 L =1x1-2 20 L =1x1-4 8 W 2x2=8 less 12 back=<4> profit 29 W 1x1=2 less 6 back=4 + 4=<8> profit 21 L 1x1-2 19 L 1x1-4 28 W 2x2=8 less 12 back=4 + 8=<12> profit 22 L 1x1-2 5 L 1x1-4 30 W 2x2=8 less 12 back=4 + 12=<16> profit 19 L 1x1-2 20 L 1x1-4 28 W 2x2=8 less 12 back=4 + 16=<20> profit 31 L 1x1-2 1 L 1x1-4 20 L 2x2-8 divided by 4=2x2 for the next bet. 18 15 28 9 W 2x2=12 less 12 back=even & start again with <20> profit 9 W 1x1=2 less 6 back=4 + 20=<24> profit 8 W 1x1=2 less 6 back=4 + 24=<28> profit 17 L 1x1-2 21 L 1x1-4 1 L 2x2-8 divided by 4=2x2 for next bet 7 34 L 2x2-12 div by 4=3x3 19 L 3x3-18 div by 4=5x5 23 L 5x5-28 div by 4=7x7 23 15 27 10 W 7x7=42 less 42 back=even & start again with <28> profit 21 L 1x1-2 33 L 1x1-4 26 W 2x2=8 less 12 back=4 + 28=<32> profit 18 L 1x1-2 16 L 1x1-4 19 L 2x2-8 div by 4=2x2 for next bet 9 18 L 2x2-12 div by 4=3x3 36 L 3x3-18 div by 4=5x5 27 W 5x5=28 less 30 back=2 +32=<34> profit 15 L 1x1-2 28 W 1x1=4 less 6 back=2 + 34=<36> profit 24 L 1x1-2 8 W 1x1=4 less 6 back=2 + 36=<38> profit 16 L 1x1-2 7 W 1x1=4 less 6 back=2 + 38=<40> profit 29 W 1x1=2 less 6 back=4 + 40=<44> profit 9 W 1x1=2 less 6 back=4 + 44=<48> profit 32 L 1x1-2 35 L 1x1-4 32 L 2x2-8 div by 4=2x2 for next bet 26 6 L 2x2-12 div by 4=3x3 17 L 3x3-18 div by 4=5x5 23 L 5x5-28 div by 4=7x7 27 19 L 7x7-42 div by 4=11x11 10 W 11x11=64 less 66 back=2 + 48=<50> profit 26 W 1x1=2 less 6 back=4 + 50=<52> profit 19 L 1x1-2 2 L 1x1-4 1 L 2x2-8 div by 4=3x3 for the next bet 19 16 7 Very surprising results from this. There were 55 bets for 18 wins & 37 losses. Using the 4 point divisor plan with no variations we can see a net profit of <44> “Note” This is a very powerful way to bet this Method of Chippo’s because only 1 win will get us even or a small win on a losing streak. The down side to it is the bets rise quickly on a losing streak. There is a safer way to play this but you will need a win or two more when winning to get even or get a profit from it. Well I have done My best for you Guys Now lets see where we take it from here. Lanky

hey lanky the numbers 7,8,9,10,11,12 apear to be all over the board but there realy not. 7 directly across from 8 9 directly across from 10 11 directly across from 12 25 directly across from 26 27 directly across from 28 28 directly across from 30 the other sectors are set up the exact same way DIRCTLY ACROSS FROM EACH OTHER. the numbers just apear to be scatterd on the wheel but there not. and after you see HOW hot these sectors can get you wil see why the numbers APEAR TO BE SCATTERD. write down the sectors from chippos post then see where ther at on the wheel.you will start to see the game in a whole new light.then study how those sectors fall.you will see. LANKY , i never played chippos other sector system.but i will go back and look at it.from your post it looks like that bad run is not so bad if you whould have bet after the back to back hits. peace out

What?? Are there more Sectors than Chippo's Sector 1-3 and the GPM??? My Posts seem to be totally ignored here but of course, i'm the N00b here so why bother...?

Compaq61 Sometimes we get busy in our other lives and can't be on line. No one ignores any polite person, to my knowledge. In Chippo's posted system there are three sectors. However, a sector is what you want it to be. It could be three numbers or 33 numbers. It's all in how you cut the pie. More questions? Sam

This is a suggestion............
......this is only a suggestion. Could we refer to that spinning thingy as the "wheel" and that checkered thingy where you lay down your chips as the "table"? Sam

hi lanky, in my post wasn't trying imply that sector 7,8,9,10,11,12, 25,26,27,28,29 is dominet over the other sectors,you can play all the sectors.

????????
People, I am so confused I can't even express the confusion properly. Chippo's sectors were adjacent numbers on the wheel, not consecutive numbers on the table. Where did the 7 8 9 10 11 12 come from? That is a double street. Are we talking about the post on this forum where he explains his three secotors? OR are we talking about the quiz? Sam

Lolol...Hey 2Cat:=) im on your side, now when you mention it. My first impression was that Chippo was structruring the present 12 numbers in a certain way, since i also recognized the doublestreet among the other variations. But now when people start mentioning sectors here and there apart of S!-3 im totally lost. However, the only one that's not rapping is Chippo himself so i wrote him a mail..waiting for reply..