VLS's averages framework.

VLS's averages framework.
Ok as you guys know I'm now into "winning @ the averages" framework. I'm studying this: Session bankroll: 80 units. Microgame bankroll: 16 units. Max. drawdown per session: 5 microgames. Standard session goal*: +20 units or 25% of the session bankroll. --------- *: Standard means regular session goal, since it can vary depending on previously lost sessions. My recoveries are schedules to be SLOW now. --------- Microgame's bankroll is divided like this: - Production stage: 5 units. - Recovery stage: 11 units. --------- Production stage = Lw's on 5-line systems. Recovery stage = Cutting large series at the even chances with 1-3-7 martingale. Ideally entering at 4 or 3 of the same one. 3 suggest the best balance between betting opportunity and risk for a series of 6 elements. At all times try to cut the longest series present. Ideally more than 4, but like just been said, 3 represent a good balance. Strategy: Follow the trend at all times. Use as many information as possible. Use criterion to choose between two betting opportunities. I.E. which even change is currently having the stronger trend for shorter series and bet on it. --------- Game: as situational as possible. It is intended to make a synergy. At times the 5 line-game do actually skip long losing series for the even chances. --------- Locking winnings is mandatory. Every won unit which makes me be in the plus is locked and not put back in game. This is what I mean with max. drawdown per session: 5 microgames. It is the max. drawdown at ALL TIMES of the session. If I make +12, when added to the 80 original bankroll brings balance to 92 units. Shall I lose the 5 microgrames in a row, I can only lose the max drawdown of -80. I have made and locked +12. So -80 + 12 = -68. This what I write down as units lost and the amount to be spread among the further recovery sessions. The only way to lose it all is not to be even +1 in the plus at ANY time of the session. --------- When you are thinking +20 is way too little, please remember you can adjust the unit value. It is a matter of making money for a living, not only "units". Also, 25% of return per session is huge. Think about it. --------- This is SLOW to recoup after the fist microgame's bankroll is lost and you are in the red, but it is possible. I have already ran several sessions and this is very nice working. Actually, one shouldn't care if it is slow, the main thing is to have a good opportunity to get the +20 at fair enough ratio over the non-achieved sessions to make proper money management on it (in order to pump that unit value and make it grow). --------- I am willing to run several days from some casinos like hamburg or the italian page. Since this is not optimized and tweaked, no code available, so (anyway) hand-made is better. :) --------- 2:25 a.m. my oh my! What a change in my style. From huge 2000-unit to 80-unit bankroll and microgames. (hey! microgames = mini-errors and also the hard times have "non favorable consequences" which one can handle in a better way). Best regards from this; your -evolving- friend, Victor.

P.S. When playing the original "chips in hand" roulette and facing the traditional high limit for the even chances + 5 chips in game table min., it is also valid to use a combination of 3 lines for the recovery stage. 2 chips x 3 lines = 6 chips. At least this can cover table minimum. Any 3-line combination will do. Also, you can make use of 6 streets. The more "even chances" you can chart, the better. Of course, your own personal tracking ability needs to be taken into consideration for this. As a start, it is always preferably to use lines. ------------- 2:40 a.m. I just couldn't go to sleep without telling this 3 lines / 6 streets thingie :idea:. Of course, if you are betting on cheap wheels (i.e. live online dealer at a casino allowing 1 unit of min. on any location, rapid-roulette or airball roulette) by all means use the standard even chances. They are there precisely to cover the 18 numbers with 1 unit. --------- Hope this helps. Off to bed fellows. Victor.

Hi Victor, you can to show on a small example with numbers, I do not understand some words! Cheers, Gamlet.

Sure gamlet, I can start making the -*test*-('")s with public actuals. It has done "so so" in my local casino's actuals, but to expose it, better to do it with hamburg or similar to suit worldwide -*test*-('")ers. It is very easy to do indeed! ------- Gamlet, you weren't around for the Lw's explanation but you'll soon catch-up. It is a trend-based play, based on the layout. I use the layout locations instead of straight-up bets to save chips and keep unit requirement low for the start. If this works OK the unit valur surely can rise! ------- Warning: Since this is not based on the "real disk", it can be seen as Fallacy-based play ;) Regards mate, Hope this leads to good port. I'll start soon the -*test*-('")ing with hamburg or any othersource of actuals.

Victor,yes, you are right, I understand the Lw's a little. I read about it in different places, but some offers are not clear to me. I understand as plays Lanky! Waits while for example a dozen №1 (12 numbers) will appear for two times successively, it puts on this dozen =1-1-1-2 (progression) = have lost = stop.Then the same dozen № 1 (12 numbers) has appeared again ,successively two times = Lanky put = 2-3-4-5 (progression) = win . I do not understand why Lanky has chosen strategy to wait two times successively occurrence of a dozen (why not three or four times successively). I as do not understand, that it is necessary to make if Lanky when loses =1-1-1-2 and 2-3-4-5 too loses what to do then? I know, that you explained it many times, at different forums. I was not present during it, but I read your posts and I do not understand some offers! If you will find time a little shortly to explain to me... I shall be very grateful . :) Gamlet.

View Full Version: VLS's averages framework.