What Have U learnt Maltezan ???

Gidday Lanky For (3) loses 123=4 to bet 1234 A win wipes off 134 2 left so 2 bet=even Total bets=5 for 2 wins=40% of win bets to get even. Sorry mat8 this doesn't make sense. If your line is 123 meaning you lost 3 bets, the next bet is 4, sure we have 8 chips on the table IF we win, however only 4 of those units are profit, not 8. You have staked 4 units and have only made 4 units profit, you have NOT made 8 units profit. Now for (4) losses 1234=5 to bet 12345 A win wipes off 145 23=5 to bet 235 A win = even Total bets =6 for 2 wins=33% of win bets to get even. The same applies here, your line is 1,2,3,4 you bet 5, you win your line now becomes 2,3 Sorry mate I made an error in the bet size not the amount of bets mate. Buddy in your example you had. 12345678=( lost bets<<so if you add the 1st & the last bets =9 to bet Right ?? So now in your betting line you would have 123456789 with spin result to come We win so if you had 9 bet you get 18 back So 189=18 While can see where you are coming from, this is not my understanding of how you play the Labby. What you are doing is adding the 9 units placed bet to your string before the outcome has been determined. This is new to me, I have never used it this way, I always adjust my line after the outcome. IF this is the where the quoted 33% is derived from, then it makes it worst than I first imagined, simply a play on figures where you have to win 1 out of 2. The reason I brought this up, was to highlight the fact that with the Labby the win to loss ratio is 50%, meaning you have to win HALF of all of your bets. I've used it in the past & when it gets into trouble it tanks big time. Far superior is the Fibonacci where the win to loss ratio is true around the 28% mark depending on the string of losses encountered and how, and when you regress / back off

Gidday Lanky For (3) loses 123=4 to bet 1234 A win wipes off 134 2 left so 2 bet=even Total bets=5 for 2 wins=40% of win bets to get even. Sorry mat8 this doesn't make sense. If your line is 123 meaning you lost 3 bets, the next bet is 4, sure we have 8 chips on the table IF we win, however only 4 of those units are profit, not 8. You have staked 4 units and have only made 4 units profit, you have NOT made 8 units profit. OK my mate we will do it your way & see What happens.(It the same really) 123=you have had 3 lost bets in a row=6 lost units so the next bet is 4 It wins & wipes the 1 & 3 off the lost bets. So now you have only the 2 to cancell & bet 2 It wins=even=5 bets for 2 wines =40% of winning bets to get even Now for (4) losses 1234=5 to bet 12345 A win wipes off 145 23=5 to bet 235 A win = even Total bets =6 for 2 wins=33% of win bets to get even. The same applies here, your line is 1,2,3,4 you bet 5, you win your line now becomes 2,3 Thats right John. If we have 4 lost bets in a row=1234=10 units lost=5 to bet it wins so 5 from 10=5 23=5 to bet It wins so 5 from 5=even=6 bets for 2 wins=33% of winning bets to get even Sorry mate I made an error in the bet size not the amount of bets mate. Buddy in your example you had. 12345678=( lost bets<<so if you add the 1st & the last bets =9 to bet Right ?? So now in your betting line you would have 123456789 with spin result to come We win so if you had 9 bet you get 18 back So 189=18 While can see where you are coming from, this is not my understanding of how you play the Labby. What you are doing is adding the 9 units placed bet to your string before the outcome has been determined. This is new to me, I have never used it this way, I always adjust my line after the outcome. IF this is the where the quoted 33% is derived from, then it makes it worst than I first imagined, simply a play on figures where you have to win 1 out of 2. Ok mate Then thats the difference between you & me . I add the next bet to the string before the outcome.This saves any mistakes caused through being interupted or distracted by any number of things that go on in a casino. EG:pushing & shoveing,drinks being spilled,shouting,people wanting to talk to you etc etc. I was taught the same way as you do it.But from the very 1st bet I had I did it my way it just made SENSE to me to do it that way. The reason I brought this up, was to highlight the fact that with the Labby the win to loss ratio is 50%, meaning you have to win HALF of all of your bets. I've used it in the past & when it gets into trouble it tanks big time. Far superior is the Fibonacci where the win to loss ratio is true around the 28% mark depending on the string of losses encountered and how, and when you regress / back off Mate I was just trying to explain how they come up the 33%+1 crap that they say. And I think when I first came across this many yeras ago it was called the engineers system or some such thing. They never tell you that on a bad run you will be nearly betting your house to get out/even Your Friend Lanky

John, please check your PM's thanks ! hammy.

View Full Version: What Have U learnt Maltezan ???